Using genetic markers to select Canadian Duroc sires for lower boar taint levels in commercial hogs
Mohsen Jafarikia1,2, Laurence Maignel1, Frédéric Fortin3, Stefanie Wyss1, Wim Van Berkel4, Dan Cohoe5, Flavio Schenkel2, Jim Squires2, Brian Sullivan1
1Canadian Centre for Swine Improvement Inc., #75-960 Carling Ave., Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6Abstract: The feasibility of genetic selection against boar taint in sire lines to reduce levels of taint in
commercial progeny was investigated. Androstenone is the main compound responsible for boar
taint and in a previous study, about 50% of Duroc boars exceeded the consumer acceptance level. A
total of 1,079 Duroc boars were genotyped for 97 SNP markers in candidate genes known to be
involved in metabolism of androstenone and skatole, from which 60 markers had a MAF>0.05. The
natural logarithm of androstenone levels in fat samples of 580 boars, weighing between 90 kg and
150 kg and less than 300 days old, were used to estimate the effects of SNPs. A two-step analysis
was performed. First, the SAS GLM procedure was used to adjust phenotypes for season and the
boar�s age and weight at time of sampling. In a second step, residuals of the GLM procedure were
used in a backward elimination in the SAS REG procedure to identify the best fitting model. The
estimated effects of 17 significant SNPs were used to calculate marker-assisted estimated breeding
values (MEBVs) for androstenone levels for 452 AI boars. The top and bottom 30 boars with
extreme MEBVs were selected to produce commercial Duroc X Landrace/Yorkshire progeny.
Average androstenone MEBVs in high and low sire groups were 1.82 and 0.94, respectively.
Assuming additive effects for selected SNPs and random sampling of dams, it is expected that the
difference between average levels of androstenone in commercial progeny of high and low sire
groups would be 0.44 in log scale. Therefore, MEBVs for androstenone seem promising and will be
validated in commercial trials.
More Information:
Presentation
Presented at the 66th EAAP Annual General Meeting, August 31-September 4, 2015, Warsaw, Poland