TYPE CLASSIFICATION 2000
DRAFT October 15, 1999
Editor's Note
(to lessen the chances of misunderstanding the intent):
Information in here is from a combination of descriptions that
were developed in 1990 (i.e. the last time the program was revised), Brian's
somewhat naiive understanding which he has gleened from meetings with the
classifiers, and from descriptions Sandy had in the manual she had started.
Where descriptions for traits existed from 1990, these were generally used.
Descriptions from Sandy were used to describe a number of traits that were not
previously described. Other traits are yet to be described. In all cases,
we are counting on the classifiers to take a critical look at the
descriptions and fill in the gaps, provide suggestions to make it clearer,
and most importantly, ensure that this is consistent with what they
actually have been doing. The intention of the draft at this point is simply
make it easier for the classifiers to do this. Also, it is important to note
that there is no intended fundamental change to the program. Rather, the
intention is to make the existing program more understandable, and to provide
guidelines on how to use the information effectively. With an increased
understanding, it is likely that some fundamental changes will be made in
the future. However, it is unlikely that a concensus can be reached on
what these changes should be unless and until there is general understanding
of what is happening today.
INTRODUCTION
The Canadian Goat Society (CGS) Classification program is designed to help breeders identify the strengths and weaknesses of individual animals. The program collects data for the genetic evaluation of sires which provides information to the breeder on a sire's strengths and weaknesses. Breeders can use this genetic information to select sires which will improve the overall conformation of their herds, or to concentrate on specific areas of conformation which a herd needs to improve the most. To a lesser extent, breeders can also determine the desirable mating between individual sires and dams, but results for individual animals will be quite variable.
In celebration of the year 2000, CGS has developed this members guide to help breeders better understand and utilize classification information to improve their herds, and ultimately to improve the national breed. The classification form has also been modified to include additional explanation of the individual linear traits. This information is explained in detail in this members guide.
Before getting into the details of individual classifications, it is important for breeders to have some general understanding of what influences body conformation. Specifically, how important is genetics versus management, and what can realistically be expected from genetic decisions such as sire selection, compared to other management decisions such as hoof trimming. The guide therefore starts with some general information about genetic and management effects on body conformation. This is followed by the details for each of the eight linear traits that are scored, and how the individual linear scores are used to arrive at an overall mammary system score and the final score. The rules that the breeders must follow are listed as well. Finally, the guide will include explanations of genetic evaluations and specific help on how to make good use of this information.
============== new page ==============
Using Genetics and Management to Improve Conformation
This section will explain some basic genetic concepts such as heritability by using practical examples of what to expect for individual traits. For example, what would you expect if you mated a doe that classified 3 for feet and legs to a buck with a genetic evaluation of 6 for feet and legs? What if it was body capacity instead of feet and legs? It will also talk about the potential for long term genetic improvement of a herd and the national breed.
============== new page ==============
A copy of the classification report appears on the following page. The classification process involves rating each doe on a scale of 1 to 9 for eight linear traits. In all cases, a 9 is most desirable and 1 is least desirable. However, when arriving at the linear scores, the classifier is actually considering several different components of the trait being evaluated. These components are considered in terms of the biological range that exists for each trait, and in some cases it is an intermediate value that is desirable. The classifiers will indicate on the form approximately where they feel the doe ranks in the biological range. The shaded areas on the scale identify desirable or acceptable conformation. Does that are rated in shaded areas for all components will tend to have higher linear scores. The further away the ratings are from these shaded areas, the lower the linear scores will be. There is also a section for comments and defects. The most common defects are listed on the form for the classifiers to tick if they apply to the doe. However, there is a list of many other possible defects which occur relatively infrequently. The list is provided in this guide on the page following the classification report. Classifiers will write in any additional defects that apply to the doe. These defects will also be considered when assigning a linear score. The following pages describe each of the linear traits, and their components, with example pictures where appropriate.
============== new page ==============
<copy of the Classification Form>
============== new page ==============
<complete list of defects that used to be printed on the old form>
============== new page ==============
Attractive individuality indicating femininity, vigor and strength with harmonious blending and correlation of parts; impressive style and attractive carriage; graceful and powerful walk.
Question for classifiers and Sandy: Should there be a separate line on the grid for rump width? Should there be sketches for rump width?
============== new page ==============
Legs wide apart, squarely set; bone flat and flinty; tendons well defined. Pasterns of medium length, strong and with some spring. Feet pointed forward with closed toes, deep heel and level sole. Forelegs straight with clean knees. Hind legs nearly perpendicular from hock to pastern when viewed from the side; high and wide in the escutcheon with legs straight and well apart when viewed from the rear. Hocks clean.
============== new page ==============
Animation, angularity, general openness and freedom from excess fleshing, giving due regard to the period of lactation. Neck long and lean. Throat clean. Withers well defined and wedge shaped, rising above the shoulder blades. Ribs wide apart, bone wide, flat and long. Flank deep with arch well defined. Thighs incurving to flat when viewed from the side.
============== new page ==============
Relatively large in proportion to the size of the animal, providing ample digestive capacity, strength and vigour and showing desirable length of body. Width throughout beginning with the head and carried through the chine, back and loin. Barrel deep and strongly supported, ribs well sprung and depth and width tending to increase towards the flank. Heart deep and wide and well sprung foreribs; chest floor wide; fullness at the point of elbow.
============== new page ==============
Ligament strong and well defined, udder floor carried above hocks. Globular in shape and balanced. Texture soft and pliable, free of scar tissue and tissue well collapsed after milking. Teats well apart, squarely set and plumb.
============== new page ==============
Carried well forward, tightly attached without pocket; wide, blending smoothly into the body and indicating capacity.
============== new page ==============
High, wide and smooth, securely attached in the escutcheon, and indicating capacity.
Question: Would "Shape" under the Medial Suspensory Ligament section be better described as "Depth"?
============== new page ==============
Uniform, of correct length and circumference, cylindrical in shape, well delineated. Note that teat placement is considered in the Medial Suspensory Ligament section and is not considered again here.
The classifiers should give their best estimate of the actual measurements (the numbers above are just for an example).
============== new page ==============
<Details on Mammary System and Final Scores would be given here>
============== new page ==============
<Information on Genetic Evaluations would be given here>
============== new page ==============
<Information on buck classification would be put somewhere, perhaps here>
============== new page ==============
<Appendix 1 would describe and have sketches for breed characteristics>
============== new page ==============
Appendix 2 - On Site Information